Marijuana Grow Cases in Minnesota
Prosecutors file marijuana grow charges in both federal and state courts. Marijuana grow defense attorney Thomas Gallagher provides an overview of Minnesota criminal marijuana grow laws.
Most marijuana growing prosecutions are in State court. One reason for that is the nearly universal recognition that, if harmful to health at all, marijuana is not as harmful as other drugs. Not only that, the majority of the United States population has tried it at least once.
In addition, many United States Presidents smoked marijuana. And later we elected them to the highest public office. Another reason may be the sheer number of people who have used marijuana.
Minnesota’s Criminal Prohibition of Marijuana
Unlike other states, Minnesota State Statutes still provide for criminal remedies when sought by the government, for marijuana. Most of these prosecutions are under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 152, titled “Drugs, Controlled Substances.”
Until a few years ago, if you possessed growing marijuana, you might be prosecuted for possessing it. If the government had evidence that a grower had actually sold marijuana, then they could be prosecuted for criminal sale of the malum prohibitum.
In recent years, however, the prohibitionists expanded the statutes to create a new legal fiction – a crime by technicality provision – to turn possession of growing marijuana into a fictional “sale.”
To Grow is a … Sale?
How did the ingenuous legislature do it? It’s a complex bit of sophistry. Here goes:
- Prosecutors can charge a person in Possession of growing marijuana with a Controlled Substance Crime of Possession.
- The government changed the definition of “Sell” in Minnesota Statutes Section 152.01, subd. 15a, to now include “to manufacture.” Get that? So their claim is that to “manufacture” is the same thing as to “sell.”
- Next, in their new definition of “Manufacture” at Minnesota Statutes Section 152.01, subd. 7, they have defined “manufacture” to mean “cultivation” of “drugs.”
So you see, they have by legislative fiat made a law which purports to first define “cultivation” as “manufacture.” And then, in the next step, they presume to define “manufacture” as “sell.”
According to these lawmakers – and their lobbyists – cultivation is manufacture is selling. Apparently they believe they have the legal power to turn black into white; and possession into sale.
Just think of all the Minnesota farmers and gardeners who now should be able to avoid the trouble of harvesting, processing, distribution and sale – once the food crop has grown!
The money from the “sale”must magically appear in their pockets. Thanks Minnesota legislature!
“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”
– Humpty Dumpty
Drug prohibitionists put this kind of irrationality into Minnesota law.
Should we allow criminal conviction of a person on a technicality? Should we allow the government to ruin a person’s life with overreaching, nonsense laws?
New: number of plants
A recent amendment to Minnesota statutes added a new criteria for severity level – the number of “plants.” Minnesota Statutes Section 152.021, subd. 2 , First Degree Controlled Substance Crime – Possession:
(6) the person unlawfully possesses one or more mixtures of a total weight of 50 kilograms or more containing marijuana or Tetrahydrocannabinols, or possesses 500 or more marijuana plants.
A similar provision is now in Minnesota Statutes Section 152.022, subd. 2 , Second Degree Controlled Substance Crime – Possession:
(6) the person unlawfully possesses one or more mixtures of a total weight of 25 kilograms or more containing marijuana or Tetrahydrocannabinols, or possesses 100 or more marijuana plants.
The Third Degree through Fifth Degree criminal statutes make no mention of “plants.”
This brings into state cases an issue that has plagued federal cases for years. What is a “plant?” One thing for certain is that rootless clone is not a plant.
Using the number of plants as a measure of severity makes little sense. It’s not good public policy. We should delete it from the law. Better yet, re-legalize, with legal small-batch home grow.
But in the meantime, marijuana grow defense attorney Thomas Gallagher works hard to defend people caught up in these prosecutions.
Another Failure in the Government’s War on the People
Since the 1930s, Prohibitionists claimed that they could stop the Supply. Then, they would force People to conform. They seem to believe that government threats of violence, prosecution, imprisonment would stop people from using it. They claimed that simply making it a crime could reduce usage.
Prohibition increases usage
Of course, as economist Milton Friedman pointed out, curtailing supply (of alcohol, marijuana, tobacco, etc.) only serves to increase price where demand is strong. Then the increased price creates incentive to increase supply. And so the cycle has gone for decades – until now, as the marijuana usage rate has increased exponentially in the United States, from cultural niche in 1934, to a now near universal social experience.
Blaming the victim for the law’s harms
In past decades Prohibitionist officials have put out Reefer Madness propaganda asserting that buying marijuana in the underground economy was like supporting terrorism overseas. But as the government reduced marijuana imports into the United States, a funny thing happened.
Economist Milton Friedman was right: marijuana became the number one cash crop in United States agriculture (and still is).
It is easy to grow. The government’s drug wars against The People are a complete and unmitigated failure. The government just won’t admit it yet.
In the meantime, Minnesota Marijuana Grow Defense Attorney Thomas C Gallagher is here to help people busted for growing in the last days.
Don’t be another casualty of the government’s failed drug war. Fight back. Call Gallagher. 612 333-1500